Candidates Questionnaire - Jesse Gordon

1. Many residents feel that their property taxes are too high, and that because of this they cannot afford to buy a house or rent an apartment to stay in Cambridge. How can we make sure that property taxes keep the city affordable while providing the city with the tax base it needs?

Cambridge imposed a property tax increase of 20% or more, on about 4,400 homes this year. This tax increase hit like a bomb -- doing a lot of damage with little warning. I'm calling for a repeal of the property tax bomb -- we need to start over and make a fairer assessment.

The property tax bomb was unfair. It hit moderate-income people more than high-income people; it hit the elderly and people on fixed incomes; it hit families in moderate- and low-income neighborhoods; it hit renters whose landlords had to pass on the tax increase to them. Regressive tax increases should not happen in Cambridge. I will fight to fix the problem.

The property tax bomb was disrespectful. Most homeowners didn't find out about their huge increase until they opened their property tax bill -- "policy by heart attack" is not a good way to run a city. The City Council knew about the shock value of the tax increase last October. If they could get the tax bills out to every taxpayer -- they could have also gotten out a mailing warning people about a big tax increase coming. A few infomercials on CCTV don’t constitute public notice. People need to be able to plan their finances.

And the property tax bomb was unnecessary. It raised an extra $8 million in revenue. The city budget has a surplus of $35 million. This is above and beyond the rainy day fund. That surplus is just sitting in a bank account, unused, while hundreds of people are selling their family homes and moving out of Cambridge, or struggling to meet their tax bill.

The City Council has been saying for decades that we need to encourage rental properties and protect family-owned homes. I agree. But this tax increase does exactly the opposite -- it faces 2-family and 3-family homeowners with harsh alternatives: convert to condominiums, or raise the rent, or sell and move out of Cambridge. We need a mix of homes in Cambridge -- one-family homes, multi-family homes, rental units, apartments, condominiums -- so that people can live in homes that are appropriate for their families and appropriate for their budget. That's how we encourage diversity in Cambridge.

I've been researching the property tax bomb since January. I analyzed the tax assessor's records to show how unfair this tax increase is. You can see the results -- and explore the database yourself -- by visiting my website www.CambridgeTaxBomb.com

2. How can we make public transportation better in Cambridge and what can the City Council do to encourage residents to use public transportation?

I support transit-oriented development -- high-density development near mass transit hubs. We have two very large development projects coming to Cambridge: one in North Cambridge called the Concord-Alewife development, and one in East Cambridge called Northpoint. Together these developments will likely house more than 10,000 people when they're done, and they're both directly adjacent to T stops (Alewife and Lechmere). We should link residential and business development in those projects to improved public transportation.

Specifically, large-scale developments should have T passes written into their deeds and leases. If you want to build a high-rise, you must commit contractually to bulk-purchases of T passes for your tenants and/or employees. This kind of financial encouragement will convince people to use the T instead of using their cars, which eases pressure on traffic and parking across the city.

We can also encourage public transportation usage by providing truly useful information on both the T and the bus systems. Every T station should have large maps showing people where they are, how they might walk to their destination, and how they can find buses to their destination. Every bus stop should have a bus route, major points of interest on the route, and a full bus schedule -- not just the terminal point of the route (for example, the 77 bus on Mass Ave says "Arlington Heights" which gives no indication that it stops in Porter, three blocks from Davis, and all through North Cambridge along the way).

3. What can the city do to make sure that future negotiations with the city's unions are fair to workers?

Our city government should expect and encourage accountability and good-faith negotiations on both sides.

Cambridge should be a leader and a model for worker negotiations. The city is currently being sued over 6 cases where women were fired for disagreeing with city management. Adversarial lawsuits are a bad means of fostering worker rights and worker-management relations. We should work towards negotiated, mediated, and arbitrated settlements in all areas of worker rights and for other issues as well. The city should institute and follow a negotiation model that avoids the court system.

Please see more about my vision for Cambridge as a model of progressive leadership at my campaign website, www.jessegordon.org

4. Cambridge is one of the centers of high-tech innovation in the country. What can the City Council do to encourage innovation and take advantage of new technology while keeping the city affordable for its residents?

Cambridge is where we put the dot in dot-com. We should keep our leadership role in high-tech innovation.

We should start with establishing municipal internet as part of the city-financed infrastructure. The city should partner with businesses and universities to set up a public open internet wi-fi connection along the entire Mass Ave corridor, and then expand outward. Numerous cities already include municipal internet connections in public housing -- we should do the same, with a goal of citywide free internet connectivity.

We should bridge the digital divide in Cambridge by having computers available in all libraries, all schools, and all youth centers and community centers available on evenings and weekends. But library computers are not enough for young families. We should encourage nonprofits that rehabilitate old computers for low income families, and provide wi-fi, because a young family with small children can’t leave the house after work to use a municipal computer.

We need to see that our children, and our adults, have opportunities to learn to use tech, through public and nonprofit sources.

The best attraction Cambridge can make to high tech is an affordable, livable city with a workforce that is technically prepared for high tech jobs. Right now, that’s not our reputation. We have MIT and Harvard, but we don’t have technicians and support staff who can afford to live here, to staff burgeoning high tech industry.

Finally, we need to “sell” Cambridge. This is a terrific place to live and work. But our reputation from out of state is about taxes, not about quality of life, not about this being the Athens of America. Harvard sells that; MIT sells that; but Cambridge doesn’t recognize in itself all those qualities that should turn any company’s head.

5. What will you do to take advantage of the unique educational resources provided by the Cambridge's universities while preventing university development that threatens working families?

Cambridge should more closely partner with Harvard and MIT and our other colleges instead of having an adversarial relationship. Our universities are the source of Cambridge's uniqueness and a major source of our vibrancy and our diversity.

We need a city liaison who attends university planning meetings, so the universities know the city's needs and vice-versa. We need a person who understands the university administrations, who can work university politics, and who can align the enlightened self interests of town and gown. This is an issue of community wellbeing aligned with city planning – it has to get through to the development groups at the universities from the highest executive level, or it won’t be effective.

I’m particularly hopeful that the new president at MIT will prove her place in leadership with our whole community, and perhaps even lend leverage to our relationship with Harvard.

We should expand PILOT (university payments in lieu of taxes) to include non-monetary goals that benefit Cambridge residents at minimal expense to the universities.

For example, I would like to see Harvard-TV and MIT-TV as part of CCTV's community cable broadcasting. I would like to open more university lectures and libraries to residents, and publicize them to residents. I would like to see discounts for city residents at university arts and cultural events. I would like to see more scholarships for city resident high school grads to Cambridge's universities.

6. What can City Council do to ensure that future development is not environmentally harmful?

Cars are the largest polluter and largest source of congestion, so mass transit policy should always come first in any discussion of environmental goals. We should make our city government a model for better mass transit and alternative transportation -- for example, by using electric vehicles for the city fleet; and by giving T passes to all city employees.

We must focus in our development planning on the needs of people, not just the needs of cars. If there’s a new development off Mass Ave, what’s the first thing the neighbors fear? Parking and congestion. But that’s backwards. I want to shift the focus from traffic and parking -- to more focus on pedestrians, bicyclists, and T-riders. I would like to see an emphasis on "livability" -- with more focus open space and alternative transportation.

I would like to see the Charles River swimmable and fishable by 2020 -- that long-term goal is well on the way to being met. I would like to apply the same to Alewife River -- which is much more challenging.

We should encourage education, volunteerism and nonprofit activism on other environmental issues such as climate change, water usage reduction, recycling, and so on. The people of Cambridge want to contribute to improving these issues, and the city should provide those opportunities.

-- Jesse Gordon
1770 Mass Ave #630
Cambridge MA 02140
(617) 320-6989
jesse@jessegordon.org
http://www.jessegordon.org